Mr David Lepper MP
John Saunders House
179 Preston Road
Brighton
BN1 6AG

29/7/06

URL: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/normalsex/WebPages/Index.stm

Email: normalsex@ntlworld.com

Dear Mr Lepper


Thanks for the prompt reply from Ms Davis-Brown.
It may help if I elucidate upon my letter to you of 26/7/06.

Primarily it may be required to show how the ring is a strange attractor. To see that it is an attractor, imagine the time stream of a universe as a line. When the ring is used, it disturbs or breaks the line, and a divergent line appears at the correction. When the ring is used several times, those lines converge on the ring, and so in this way, the ring attracts universes.

To be a strange attractor, the ring must have chaotic dynamics. I cite this case: Assume that the following is true. I travelled back in time to 1941, and I approached MI5 with information that Anthony Blunt and his friends were traitors. I spoke to Brigadier Harker, who was cynical and suspicious of me. He then gave me away to Anthony Blunt, information on time travel, parentage and all.
Mr Blunt quickly had me picked up and flown over to occupied France and parachuted there, tied up, to be picked up by the Germans. I was interrogated by Horst Kopkow, who confronted me with the information that I was from the future, and knew about my Danish mother, information furnished by Mr Blunt. I admitted that I was a time traveller and told him that Germany was going to lose the war. He discussed this with other Nazis, and they decided to arrange to change my parents around, to prevent me from coming into being. So Mr Kopkow might have said something to me like, "Say goodbye to all this, and hello to oblivion!"

I said to him, "Assume I am born to father A and mother B. But previously my parentage is altered, and father A marries mother C, and mother B marries father D. Using rules of identity, I triangulate on my own position as the offspring of the central couple, A and C, and the same person is born, and I go on to fulfil the same functions."

The argument uses recursion to demonstrate topological transitivity, in that the figure or surface of abstract space is invariant under homeomorphic transformation, (the definition of topology from The Shorter Oxford Dictionary), if I am not mistaken.
If A and B are destroyed, because information is not destroyed, I still find my way, because my information is attracted to the time alteration process by the ring.

Thus it can be seen that the ring is sensitive to initial conditions, as I determined my initial condition. Sensitivity to initial conditions is the most important requisite of chaos.
"For instance, Devaney (1988) defines a time-discrete dynamical system to be chaotic if it possesses three properties: 1) sensitivity to initial conditions, 2) topological transitivity, and 3) density of periodic points." (Goertzel, page 20). Definitions of chaotic systems vary, so satisfying the first two of Devaney's conditions might suffice, until further thought is given by someone.

As for using quantum mechanical arguments over determinism, it probably wouldn't be appropriate for me to try to define what they should be, other than that I read in Wikipedia under "Strange Attractor", that quantum chaos is not deterministic, but I think the page changed and the reference disappeared. But generally thinking of how low level information and superposition combine to give a "surfing" effect until an observation is made and, "Something blinded me, like a fine, sharp line of endless light!" (Decoded Feedback, Endless Light).


Yours sincerely

Keith Murray


References: Goertzel; Chaotic Logic; Plenum Press; New York & London; 1994.
Brown (Editor); The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary; Clarendon Press; Oxford; 1993.
Audio CD: Decoded Feedback; Evolution; Metropolis Records; 1999.


Last Update 9/5/09
Back To The Letter Index
Back To The Main Index