Ring Theorem




1/10/07

In this I offer a demonstration that a device that is able to manipulate history by altering events in the past, is a strange attractor, and give plausible consequences of its use.

I refer to such a device as a ring, conscious of Professor R Mallett’s work at Connecticut University recently, using ring lasers, to try to accelerate a particle until it travels back in time. And I’m thinking of Wagner, Tolkien, and the experimental Joint European Torus, Tokamak fusion reactor in Britain.

(The following five paragraphs are taken from my letter to my MP, Mr Lepper, MP29.7.06. The quote excepts a Rocky Horror Show reference, apologies for not having done so before. Also the claim that the line grows a tail is new, I left that as a test.)

Primarily it may be required to show how the ring is a strange attractor. To see that it is an attractor, imagine the time stream of a universe as a line.
When the ring is used, it disturbs or breaks the line, and a divergent line appears at the correction. The new line immediately grows a tail, being the history of events leading to the change effected by the ring. When the ring is used several times, those lines converge on the ring, and so in this way, the ring attracts universes.

To be a strange attractor, the ring must have chaotic dynamics.
I cite this case: Assume that the following is true. I travelled back in time to 1941, and I approached MI5 with information that Anthony Blunt and his friends were traitors. I spoke to Brigadier Harker, who was cynical and suspicious of me. He then gave me away to Anthony Blunt, information on time travel, parentage and all.
Mr Blunt quickly had me picked up and flown over to occupied France and parachuted there, tied up, to be picked up by the Germans. I was interrogated by Horst Kopkow, who confronted me with the information that I was from the future, and knew about my Danish mother, information furnished by Mr Blunt.
I admitted that I was a time traveller and told him that Germany was going to lose the war. He discussed this with other Nazis, and they decided to arrange to change my parents around, to prevent me from coming into being. So Mr Kopkow might have said something to me like, “Say goodbye to all this, and hello to oblivion!” (Rocky Horror)

I said to him, “Assume I am born to father A and mother B. But previously my parentage is altered, and father A marries mother C, and mother B marries father D. Using rules of identity, I triangulate on my own position as the offspring of the central couple, A and C, and the same person is born, and I go on to fulfil the same functions.”

The argument uses recursion to demonstrate topological transitivity, in that the figure or surface of abstract space is invariant under homeomorphic transformation, (the definition of topology from The Shorter Oxford Dictionary), if I am not mistaken. If A and B are destroyed, because information is not destroyed, I still find my way, because my information is attracted to the time alteration process by the ring.

Thus it can be seen that the ring is sensitive to initial conditions, as I determined my initial condition. Sensitivity to initial conditions is the most important requisite of chaos.
“For instance, Devaney (1988) defines a time-discrete dynamical system to be chaotic if it possesses three properties: 1) sensitivity to initial conditions, 2) topological transitivity, and 3) density of periodic points.” (Goertzel, page 20).

If we view a dimension line, induced by the ring, as perhaps a tensor, the application point of the tensor to the space time continuum, is the periodic point.
The tensor collapses quantum mechanically to form the current adjusted universe. The use of the term, “dimension” is moot, though I am thinking of componential selection of reality, as in the number of sub-atomic dimensions that make up what we consider to be our three dimensional world.
But I also consider “dimension” to refer to a potential universe, held in a superposition, or even a physically real universe.

I do not subscribe to the concept that there are an infinite number of universes from which to choose and select how our world is to turn out.
There may well be, but in practise, we are most likely to find that even though manifolds may be used to localise adjustments to Euclidian space, selection of dimensions is speculative. The ring masters must compete with a universe that tends toward states not defined by the ring, for instance the information of the state of the universe as it would be after correction, had the correction not been emplaced, is retained by the manifold, and is superpositional.

I see more than one form of quantum superposition. Observation appears to be pivotal in German philosophy, such as phenomenology.
We just have to listen to musical scales, to hear one note seems asymmetrical to the rest, thus the observing note defines the scale. If we travel between Moscow and StPetersburg in Russia, when we are in either place, there is where we are. But where are we en route? Formally, if we are not at either position, we aren’t anywhere, we are in a superposition, drawing on Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. To say that these are not quantum superpositions, doesn’t entirely convince me, rather that superposition is a substrate, extending from the quantum world to the multiverse.

My intuitive concept of a manifold is something we can draw upon to provide from a distant space, in probabilistic or logical terms, to effect a change locally.
But the remaining superpositional universes, and even this one, can support attractors, that communicate and affect the selections made by the ring.
Consequently, those universes, are as real as the universe in which we now live, and can be accessed, followed and manipulated, they may cluster together to configure a Ricci Solution, by covariance.
Thus the ring master can find he doesn’t after all have access to an infinite number of universes, or options. If he simply therefore calls for selections from much further ahead in time, that will probably help him, but at the risk of betraying his position in the time space continuum, to attractors, and the positions of his compatriots and devices far ahead or behind.
The general idea is not to use huge power and great effort to locate and manipulate such universes, rather to allow much to occur naturally, to use reasoning and perception to plot a course toward an acceptable sequence of events. Here is a version of a theorem I proposed earlier:

On 28/8/07, I raised a question, at a Sussex University seminar on insect olfaction, delivered by Michael Schmuker, of the Berlin Free University.
I wondered if contact with the ground enhanced olfaction. Every step on the ground produces an interaction, let's say by earthing or exchanging electrical current.
Now, assume an interpretation of the possible and recent steps made by a creature, in the context of the creature's decisions, can be represented as a manifold.
The exchanges suggested above, create carrier waves in the manifold, and also assuming the creature's brain and mind form a manifold, then covariance between the brain and the world allows even a simple creature to follow scent, without consciously needing to do so. Hence this may imply that this covariance precedes conscious decision making.

Thanks and praise to Mr Grigori Perelman for proving, so far without counterexample, Poincaré’s Conjecture, with help from Mr Richard Hamilton’s work to provide a method, using Ricci flow. Also to Mr Mallett, and to interested parties.


Keith Murray

References:

Goertzel; Chaotic Logic; Plenum Press; New York & London; 1994.
Brown (Editor); The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary; Clarendon Press; Oxford; 1993.
Film: Director, J Sharman, The Rocky Horror Picture Show, 20th Century Fox, 1975
J.E.T. Tokamak: http://www.jet.efda.org/pages/fusion-basics/fusion3.html
Heisenberg's Uncertainty: http://www.thebigview.com/spacetime/uncertainty.html
Links accessed 1/10/07.

Hyperlinks, accessed 1/10/07:

Liu, Liu, Chang, Xu, Ricci Solution:
http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0504021

Perelman, Grisha:
http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Amath%2F0211159


Back To The Main Index
Last Update: 9/5/09